Declaration concerning religion, ethics, and the crisis in the Clinton presidency
The following declaration can be found at moral-crisis.org, November 16, 1998
The following declaration can be found at moral-crisis.org
To be released on 13 November 1998
As scholars interested in religion and public life, we protest the manipulation of religion and the debasing of moral language in the discussion about presidential responsibility. We believe that serious misunderstandings of repentance and forgiveness are being exploited for political advantage. The resulting moral confusion is a threat to the integrity of American religion and to the foundations of a civil society. In the conviction that politics and morality cannot be separated, we consider the current crisis to be a critical moment in the life of our country and, therefore, offer the following points for consideration:
1. Many of us worry about the political misuse of religion and religious symbols even as we endorse the public mission of our churches, synagogues, and mosques. In particular we are concerned about the distortion that can come by association with presidential power in events like the Presidential Prayer Breakfast on September 11. We fear the religious community is in danger of being called upon to provide authentication for a politically motivated and incomplete repentance that seeks to avert serious consequences for wrongful acts. While we affirm that pastoral counseling sessions are an appropriate, confidential arena to address these issues, we fear that announcing such meetings to convince the public of the President’s sincerity compromises the integrity of religion.
2. We challenge the widespread assumption that forgiveness relieves a person of further responsibility and serious consequences. We are convinced that forgiveness is a relational term that does not function easily within the sphere of constitutional accountability. A wronged party chooses forgiveness instead of revenge and antagonism, but this does not relieve the wrong-doer of consequences. When the President continues to deny any liability for the sins he has confessed, this suggests that the public display of repentance was intended to avoid political disfavor.
3. We are aware that certain moral qualities are central to the survival of our political system, among which are truthfulness, integrity, respect for the law, respect for the dignity of others, adherence to the constitutional process, and a willingness to avoid the abuse of power. We reject the premise that violations of these ethical standards should be excused so long as a leader remains loyal to a particular political agenda and the nation is blessed by a strong economy. Elected leaders are accountable to the Constitution and to the people who elected them. By his own admission the President has departed from ethical standards by abusing his presidential office, by his ill use of women, and by his knowing manipulation of truth for indefensible ends. We are particularly troubled about the debasing of the language of public discourse with the aim of avoiding responsibility for one’s actions.
4. We are concerned about the impact of this crisis on our children and on our students. Some of them feel betrayed by a President in whom they set their hopes while others are troubled by his misuse of others, by which many in the administration, the political system, and the media were implicated in patterns of deceit and abuse. Neither our students nor we demand perfection. Many of us believe that extreme dangers sometimes require a political leader to engage in morally problematic actions. But we maintain that in general there is a reasonable threshold of behavior beneath which our public leaders should not fall, because the moral character of a people is more important than the tenure of a particular politician or the protection of a particular political agenda. Political and religious history indicate that violations and misunderstandings of such moral issues may have grave consequences. The widespread desire to “get this behind us” does not take seriously enough the nature of transgressions and their social effects.
5. We urge the society as a whole to take account of the ethical commitments necessary for a civil society and to seek the integrity of both public and private morality. While partisan conflicts have usually dominated past debates over public morality, we now confront a much deeper crisis, whether the moral basis of the constitutional system itself will be lost. In the present impeachment discussions, we call for national courage in deliberation that avoids ideological division and engages the process as a constitutional and ethical imperative. We ask Congress to discharge its current duty in a manner mindful of its solemn constitutional and political responsibilities. Only in this way can the process serve the good of the nation as a whole and avoid further sensationalism.
6. While some of us think that a presidential resignation or impeachment would be appropriate and others envision less drastic consequences, we are all convinced that extended discussion about constitutional, ethical, and religious issues will be required to clarify the situation and to enable a wise decision to be made. We hope to provide an arena in which such discussion can occur in an atmosphere of scholarly integrity and civility without partisan bias.
The following scholars subscribe to the Declaration:
1. Paul J. Achtemeier (Union Theological Seminary in Virginia)
2. P. Mark Achtemeier (University of Dubuque Theological Seminary)
3. LeRoy Aden (Lutheran Theological Seminary in Philadelphia)
4. Diogenes Allen (Princeton Theological Seminary)
5. Joseph Alulis (North Park University)
6. Charles L. Bartow (Princeton Theological Seminary)
7. Donald G. Bloesch (University of Dubuque Theological Seminary)
8. Carl Braaten (Center for Catholic and Evangelical Theology)
9. Manfred Brauch (Eastern Baptist Theological Seminary)
10. William P. Brown (Union Theological Seminary in Virginia)
11. Don S. Browning (University of Chicago)
12. Frederick S. Carney (Southern Methodist University)
13. Ellen T. Charry (Princeton Theological Seminary)
14. Karl Paul Donfried (Smith College)
15. Richard Drummond (University of Dubuque Theological Seminary)
16. Jean Bethke Elshtain (University of Chicago)
17. Edward E. Ericson, Jr. (Calvin College)
18. Gabriel Fackre (Andover Newton Theological School)
19. Robert Gagnon (Pittsburgh Theological Seminary)
20. Joel B. Green (Asbury Theological Seminary)
21. Robert H. Gundry (Westmont College)
22. Scott J. Hafemann (Wheaton College)
23. Roy A. Harrisville (Luther Theological Seminary)
24. Stanley M. Hauerwas (Duke University)
25. Gerald F. Hawthorne (Wheaton College)
26. S. Mark Heim (Andover Newton Theological School)
27. Frank Witt Hughes (Codrington College)
28. Robert Imbelli (Boston College)
29. Robert Jenson (Center for Theological Inquiry)
30. Robert Jewett (Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary)
31. Jack Dean Kingsbury (Union Theological Seminary in Virginia)
32. Paul Koptak (North Park Theological Seminary)
33. John S. Lawrence (Morningside College)
34. Walter Liefeld (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School)
35. Troy Martin (Saint Xavier University)
36. James L. Mays (Union Theological Seminary in Virginia)
37. S. Dean McBride (Union Theological Seminary in Virginia)
38. Sheila E. McGinn (John Carroll University)
39. John R. McRay (Wheaton College)
40. Robert Meye (Fuller Theological Seminary)
41. David Moessner (University of Dubuque Theological Seminary)
42. Grant Osborne (Trinity Evangelical Divinity School)
43. Carroll D. Osburn (Abilene Christian University)
44. William A. Pannell (Fuller Theological Seminary)
45. Jon Paulien (Andrews University)
46. John Piper (Bethlehem Baptist Church)
47. Stephen Pope (Boston College)
48. J. E. Powers (Hope College
49. Mark Reasoner (Bethel College),
50. John Reumann (Lutheran Theological Seminary at Philadelphia)
51. David Rhoads (Lutheran School of Theology at Chicago)
52. W. Larry Richards (Andrews University)
53. Daniel E. Ritchie (Bethel College)
54. Joel Samuels (University of Dubuque Theological Seminary)
55. David Scholer (Fuller Theological Seminary)
56. Keith Norman Schoville (University of Wisconsin)
57. J. Julius Scott (Wheaton College)
58. Mark Seifrid (Southern Baptist Theological Seminary)
59. Christopher R. Seitz (St. Andrews University)
60. Klyne Snodgrass (North Park Theological Seminary)
61. Max Stackhouse (Princeton Theological Seminary)
62. W. Richard Stegner (Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary)
63. Jeanne Stevenson-Moessner (University of Dubuque Theological Seminary)
64. R. Franklin Terry (Morningside College)
65. David Tiede (Luther Theological Seminary)
66. Reinder Van Til (Eerdmans Publishing Company)
67. Warren Wade (North Park University)
68. J. Ross Wagner (Princeton Theological Seminary)
69. David H. Wallace (American Baptist Seminary of the West)
70. Timothy P. Weber (Northern Baptist Theological Seminary)
71. Merold Westphal (Fordham University)
72. Jonathan R. Wilson (Westmont College)
73. Edward and Anne Wimberly (Interdenominational Theological Center)
74. Harry Yeide (George Washington University)