By Russell Moore, Moore to the Point.
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether states can legally choose to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman. It is a watershed moment in our nation’s history. As an organization, we have filed briefs with the court, argued in public and in private about why marriage, defined as the union of one man and one woman, matters as a social good, and more than I have space to list in one post. But beyond all this we as Christians and churches need to pray—because marriage is not just another culture war issue.
As Christians we know that it is not even possible for any government to actually redefine what God has defined from eternity. Marriage is about more than registering relationships at a courthouse. Marriage is about the common good and flourishing of society, but is also an icon of the union between Christ and his church, embedded in the creation (Eph. 5:22-31). Without a Christian vision of marriage, we have no Christian vision of the gospel.
As a church we need to pray that marriage will not be treated as if it were a tattered house standing in the way of government construction—there to be plowed out of the way in the name of progress. And yet, on the other hand, we must pray and ask God to give us wisdom so that moving forward we would be able to spell out with convictional kindness why marriage matters, in light of who we are as men and women and in light of the gospel mystery of Christ and his church.
We ought to pray that Jesus would overcome the atrophy that we’ve allowed our own marriages and families to fall in for too long. The belief in our churches that culture was enough to keep marriages intact has been exposed as a disastrous folly. With chaos like adultery, abandonment, and divorce running rampant in our pews, how did we fail to see that we were then, in that moment, outsourcing our marriages and our families to culture?
But most of all, we must pray that, regardless of whether our land’s highest court recognizes the unchangeable or not, we will hold steadfast. We must love our neighbors enough to have the confidence of people who have heard a word from God and the compassion of a people who are on a mission with God. We must learn from our Savior, who was neither shocked by the Samaritan woman’s sexual sin nor afraid to speak a word of repentance to her conscience. “Woman, go get your husband and come here” is our model: an unashamed assessment of sin and an unrestrained invitation to come to Jesus.
The stakes are high. The price of getting marriage wrong is steep, and as in the rest of the Sexual Revolution, children will foot much of the bill. It matters tremendously to our nation and to future generations that we agree with God on this.
Let’s pray that the Court gets this right and stays within the limits of its authority—recognizing that the state did not create the family, and cannot recreate it. And at the same time let’s pray with confidence in the knowing that regardless of how the Court decides, on the other side of our culture wars there is a sexual counter-revolution waiting to be born—again.
—–
The Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission is asking you to join us in praying for the preservation and strengthening of marriage as oral arguments involving several cases on same-sex marriage are heard before the Supreme Court on April 28.
For more information on #PrayforMarriage, visit http://erlc.com/prayformarriage.
4 Comments. Leave new
The current Supreme Court may indeed uphold the definition of marriage as between a man and a woman, but in the future, if liberals continue to win the Presidency and appoint liberal judges,then all bets are off and marriage will be definitely re-defined! But let us not be dismayed, because God is still in charge of His creation as it has been foretold!
I love the picture you have on your website with the subtitle “PCUSA Marriage Resources.” It’s great that it shows two men’s rings with the words “The Two” and “Become One.”
The picture shows two wedding bands, not “two men’s rings”; sometimes women wear wedding bands in lieu of a diamond ring. A case in point: my wife regularly wears a wedding band and only wears the diamond ring I gave her at our wedding on special occasions, as she doesn’t want to accidentally scratch either of our two small daughters with the diamond.
Many thanks for a powerful blog!
For us here in the UK — and increasingly even in the US —
gay marriage ends up meaning gay education. Stonewall (LGBT advocacy group) is now embedded in 800+ primary and secondary schools — and youngsters 4 and older are being brainwashed/groomed into becoming ‘LGBT Champions’. With a few happy exceptions, the church is oblivious.
Secondly, gay marriage increasingly means gay-only views allowed at work etc. To dissent is professional suicide. Again, the church has missed the memos! Alpha is so much more hip!
Third, please can someone start to flag how the post-binary is coming the the fore? That means that three people are wanting to marry — and are succeeding in ‘enlightened’ parts of the world like Thailand (the world’s first ‘throuple’ tied the knot in February).
Why does the Human Rights Campaign keep discriminating against more alternative sexualities and marital forms?
Unless something happens, the Carpenter’s ‘We’ve only just begun’ will be realized in a deeply tragic way.