logo


Presbyterians for Renewal
Compromise of Gospel
hits unprecedented level


The Layman
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
218th General Assembly
San Jose, California
June 20-28, 2008

Articles from the General Assembly
SAN JOSE, Calif. – The following is the statement, dated June 27, by Presbyterians for Renwal on the 218th General Assembly:

Sometimes it takes pain to make things clear. While this General Assembly was not the first to bring pain to the church, its pain has been used by God to bring clarity to Presbyterians for Renewal.

For two decades Presbyterians for Renewal has worked with congregations to faithfully engage in God's mission in the world. Our hope in the Lord Jesus Christ and our commitment to the Presbyterian movement remain strong.

The faith and witness of the Presbyterian Church (USA) has been a consistent concern both of our congregations and of PFR as a national organization. As our North American culture has changed, our denomination has changed along with it. Having lost sight of her clear, Christ-centered identity, the PCUSA has continued to embrace our culture's beliefs and morals.

Gospel compromised
The actions of the 218th General Assembly have made it clear that the PCUSA's compromise of the Gospel of Jesus Christ has reached an unprecedented level. It is clear that the PCUSA's confession of the Lordship of Jesus Christ and commitment to our Reformed confessions has weakened to the point that we can no longer assume a common framework of conversation. The pain of this realization has been used by God to clarify our next steps. While PFR's mission has not changed, our context has. We are compelled to do the following:
  • In order to faithfully witness to the Lordship of Jesus Christ in and for the PCUSA, we will actively pursue a means of re-shaping the life of the denomination. For the sake of our witness to the Gospel, we believe it is necessary for the different visions of Christian faith and life in the PCUSA to be expressed in formally distinct bodies without a formal split in the denomination. Such possibilities have been discussed hypothetically under the rubrics of non-geographical or "missional" presbyteries and synods. We will pursue the ideas and relationships necessary to make this a reality, and we call upon the whole church to think creatively about ways to achieve this end. Perhaps revisions to the work of the Form of Government Task Force that will be brought to the next General Assembly are a way to advance this effort.
  • We will no longer consider the debates over ordination standards and sexual ethics as a meaningful venue to seek resolution of our denominational malaise. We acknowledge that we are simply talking past each other, and realize that this debate is merely a symptom of deeper divisions. These deeper divisions include our understandings of the authority of Jesus Christ as Head of the Church, and our calling to exhibit the Kingdom of Heaven to the world. As we pursue a means to make these differences manifest in "missional" governing bodies, we hope that over the long-term God will re-unite the faith of the PCUSA and enable a formal re-unification.
  • While we pursue significant changes to our denomination's polity, we will work to defeat the amendment to the "Fidelity and Chastity" standard for ordination, and to bring to the next General Assembly a new "Authoritative Interpretation" regarding homosexual practice. We will also work to improve the processes each presbytery uses to elect commissioners to General Assembly, so that the next GA is more representative of the faith and life of the PCUSA. We do not, however, believe such measures are an adequate response to the state of the PCUSA, and therefore will pursue the larger polity changes mentioned above.
  • We will also pursue a revision of our constitution's property provisions, which would allow those who cannot live with the church's ordination standards to depart with their property. In the providence of God this may at some point serve those who have advocated changing our traditional standards. Regardless, we believe that the unavoidable lawsuits that proceed from our current property provisions are a disgrace to God's mission in the world.
  • While these polity actions take form, we will encourage our congregations to begin or continue redirecting their giving into missions and ministries that serve the Kingdom. In the past we leapt through many hoops to keep our giving within denominational structures that we believed would be faithful. While those ministries remain a viable option, we will no longer hesitate to direct our giving to ministries beyond the current forms of the PCUSA.
  • We will also pursue missional partnerships within and beyond the PCUSA, including a means of confessing our faith in the Lordship of Jesus Christ with integrity, so that mission and ministry might proceed in good faith even while larger polity solutions are being worked out.
Call for faith and witness
We do not see the way to the end of this particular path, but we believe that God is calling us to take these next steps, and we welcome those who would walk with us. We especially look forward to working with Presbyterians of racial and ethnic distinction, and with Presbyterians in other parts of the world, whose concerns for the faith and witness of the PC(USA) we share. Our primary concern in taking these steps is to enable our congregations to faithfully proclaim and live out the Gospel of Jesus Christ in their own communities, and to do so together.

Our hope is and will remain in Jesus Christ and him alone. All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to him, and we confess our firm confidence in his power to renew his church. We call the Presbyterian Church (USA) to a new season of prayer and repentance, and to gather in solemn assemblies to ask the Lord's guidance as we face these changes in the life of our denomination.

Respond to this article
Home · Archives · The Layman · PLC Publications
Presbyterian Lay Committee · Feedback · Links