May 2008 letters Archives of letters to the editor

PPF's program just happened to fall on the Memorial Day weekend? May 29, 2008 I sometimes wonder if those in leadership positions in the PCUSA think their members are complete idiots. Take for example, the Presbyterian Peace Fellowship's (PPF) latest message from Rick Ufford-Chase about their program titled "Resisting Militarism." Rick says the program just happened to fall on the Memorial Day weekend by accident because it was a three-day weekend. Are we supposed to think that when planning the program, no one really knew what holiday was being recognized that weekend? Then he goes on to say that the program was simply intended to inform students that there are "other, non-military options for living out a life of service to the Church." Really? Somehow that doesn't quite seem to fit the program title of "Resisting Militarism." If the PPF is going to spend their funds on efforts to degrade military service, that's up to them. Frankly, I'm quite pleased to see them wasting their money that way since they will not succeed. However, it really bothers me when they then lie about their intents. Ronald Everett Col, AUS-Ret. North Olmsted, Ohio I have seen military service absolutely transform young people May 29, 2008 I find Mr. Ufford-Chase's anti-military/anti-USA behavior absolutely shameful! I am blessed to be descended from a strong Christian-Presbyterian family (at least the last 250 years that I can document) and also descended from generations of men who have fought and some who died defending our country. As a youth director at a crisis ministry working with the poor, I am appalled as I have seen military service absolutely transform young people into successful adults. The military provides the greatest opportunity for young adults to move out of poverty and ignorance into an educated and middle class lifestyle. And serving in Iraq is much safer than living in many of our large cities urban areas. I have spoken with Mr. Ufford-Chase in the past, and my evaluation is that he is spiritually blind and historically blind. I pity him. I also praise God that I am not longer affiliated with the PCUSA! Andrew McCaskill 'We must move beyond one faceted interpretation of Biblical verse' May 29, 2008 The Layman treats homosexuality as if it is a modern leprosy plague. With declining church and attendance and membership, we must move beyond one faceted interpretation of Biblical verse and allow congregations to embrace gay people in the same way they welcome straight people. Patrick Allin Ridgewood, N.J. Mouths need to be fed at the same time that souls are saved May 29, 2008 I appreciate the clarification from Walter L. Taylor and Viola Larson (letters to the editor, posted May 27, 2008) regarding my statement that liberals and not conservatives resisted Hitler. I based my comment on (a) I tend to list Karl Barth, author of the Barmen Declaration, as a "liberal" since he is also the father of neo-orthodoxy – sometimes labeling leads to misunderstanding, (b) Martin Niemoller in October of 1945 apologized for the surviving Confessing Church for their failure to speak out against the Nazi regime, and (c) Pope Pius XII was widely criticized for his silence during the Nazi years. But yes, I'm sure it's true that many theological liberals got cozy with Hitler. But enough about German church history. The point that I was trying to make is that liberals have in fact often engaged society and faced justice issues in a way that many conservatives haven't. I am not aware that the Moral Majority people ever brought in very many homeless from the cold, although perhaps some did. More and more, a new breed of evangelicals is coming to the realization that mouths need to be fed at the same time that souls are saved. Nineteenth century evangelicals, in Britain and the U.S., were equally active in evangelistic rallies and revivals and in social reform, i.e. the abolitionist movement, prison reform, child labor laws, etc. The late Francis Schaeffer denounced the "personal peace and affluence" values of so many contemporary evangelicals. Here at African Bible College in Malawi, where I am the faculty member responsible for student outreach, students are going out weekly and doing feeding programs in villages while conducting Bible studies and proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The other point I was trying to make is that the mainstream of the PCUSA, in pursuing "justice," has (a) adopted a radically leftist political agenda (re: the Ufford-Chase peacenik thing), and (b) left Jesus and the Scriptures behind. This, in turn, is widely seen as a leading cause for the denomination's decline – in numbers, finances and missionary presence. Though I'm in the EPC, I would like nothing better than to see the PCUSA change course at its upcoming General Assembly and adopt a more Biblical position. Miracles, while almost by definition are rare occurrences, can still happen. Presbyterians have a proud legacy of promoting education and storming the beaches on the mission field. They opened hospitals and built churches in the world's remotest areas. The American government looks like Presbyterian polity because the Constitution was largely written by Presbyterians. Today the liberal Presbyterians are rapidly shrinking while the conservative ones are mostly treading water. I think that Presbyterianism is worth preserving. My prayer is that the American Presbyterian legacy is never lost. Larry Brown African Bible College Lilongwe, Malawi 'I was correct in deciding that the PCUSA is beyond reform' May 28, 2008 Good thing these anti-military protesters were not around during World War II or we might all be speaking German (or Japanese). This program dishonors my 26 years of service in the USMC as well as that of my son who is currently serving. It also convinces me that I was correct in deciding that the PCUSA is beyond reform. I almost (and should have) left the PCUS during Vietnam as the handwriting was already on the wall, and reunion was just around the corner. After over 50 years in the mainline denomination, three years ago my wife and I found refuge in the PCA, a denomination that completely supports our military, especially with chaplains. I only wish we made the move earlier. It is refreshing to hear preaching from a Reformed perspective and to belong to a denomination that actually knows what it believes – the five solas and the doctrines of grace. Charles P. Preston Jr. Col USMC (ret.) Tappahannock, Va. Ufford-Chase has difficult time when expected to show patriotic support for military May 28, 2008 I noticed some commentary about Rick Ufford-Chase and the Presbyterian Peace Fellowship's "Resisting Militarism" program directed toward Presbyterian youth, a program that happened this past weekend in New Mexico. Lest there be any doubt about how Rick Ufford-Chase feels about the U.S. military and the war in Iraq, and the subject of showing patriotic spirit in a public setting, one has only to read his Rick's own words, ostensibly extemporaneously written on his laptop computer and posted in the first section of his blog titled "What I See" on Nov 17, 2005. He wrote the piece as he sat in the airport in Atlanta, Ga., waiting for a flight connection. He clearly admits that he has a difficult time and feels emotionally conflicted when he is in a public situation where he feels there is an expectation for him to show patriotic support for U.S. military servicemen and women. The first half of his blog that day pretty much lays out his feelings, but to be sure that his comments are taken in full context, one can read the whole blog. I fear that we may have a candidate for president who may share with Mr. Ufford-Chase many of the same conflicted feelings toward military service, but I don't think you will be able to get that candidate to talk about it honestly during the campaign. Gary J. Green Chandler, Ariz. Let us be careful what we hope for May 28, 2008 Commissioners to General Assembly are being asked in this petition "to support proposals which will ensure every congregation its property rights." Let us be careful what we hope for. Congregational ownership of property is the ultimate local-option hammer that could lead to church properties being diverted from worship and sold for secular profit. A close look at church properties in small communities in most any presbytery in the land will reveal the potential of this problem. William E. Diggs Tulsa, Okla. The Church must never be captive to any human political ideology May 28, 2008 I would like to recommend a very powerful book which I trust you will read during this time of presidential elections in our country. It is: The Myth of a Christian Nation – How the Quest for Political Power is Destroying the Church by Gregory A. Boyd (Zondervan Publishing Co.), an evangelical pastor of a large church in Minnesota. He warns of the danger of the church being captive to any political party or ideology, something which is happening among many evangelical churches today. Though the Church stands for the politics of Jesus and the principles of the kingdom of God, it must never be captive to any human political ideology, whether left or right. Presently the danger is to be captivated by the right-wing political agenda. Boyd is very Biblical in his approach and I believe makes a very strong case in defense of his thesis. I personally believe he is being prophetic and hope you will read his book even if you end up disagreeing with him. He should at least be heard. He is no theological liberal and is clear on his evangelical convictions but rejects the identification of the Christian faith with either the Democrat or the Republican party. Rev. Eriberto (Eddie) Soto 'Those who refuse to defend their freedom are destined to lose it' May 27, 2008 As a person who retired with 24 years of combined active and reserve service in both the Army and Navy, I would like to remind Mr. Ufford-Chase that the only reason he can engage in this silliness in safety and freedom is because of people like me and my comrades in arms who have defended the freedoms he enjoys these 232 years. We have become a country of wimps who are entertaining and eating ourselves to death while decrying, if not defaming those who defend our country. Thomas Jefferson said, "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." Those who refuse to defend their freedom are destined to lose it, and along with that loss would go the freedom to do the things that Mr. Ufford-Chase and the ACSWP do. We should bring back the draft. Universal service. A couple of years in the military would go a long way toward straightening out many of the things that are wrong with this country. Rev. Charles A. McFarlin Spring Hill Presbyterian Church Staunton, Va. PCUSA peaceniks make excuses for their misguided behavior May 27, 2008 I have no regard for Presbyterian peaceniks, who make excuses – even lie – in order to avoid criticism of their misguided behavior. No thinking person would schedule an anti-military event on a national holiday which honors servicemen who have died serving their country. Several of my friends have permanent residence in Arlington National Cemetery. It is even more reprehensible that the PCUSA is sponsoring and lending its name to such an event. As a 40-year member of this denomination, I resent being associated or connected in any way with this effort. As a retired Army officer who served in two wars, I resent even more the effort to tell young people they should not serve in the military. Have the advocates for such behavior ever served a day in the military? What is their rationale, other than a hatred for anything military? They don't have the foggiest idea of the rewards for serving in the military. After five years of active duty, I was given an all-expense-paid year and a half to get a master's degree from Georgia Tech. Peaceniks in the PCUSA seem to be obsessed with taking political journeys into territory in which they are ill-equipped. Twenty years ago, they published a study "Peacemaking, Are We Now Called to Resistance." This was during the height of the cold war with the Soviet Union. Yet this study recommended punishing the USA by withholding income taxes and making violent attacks against U.S. weapons storage sites. In response I volunteered to serve on our presbytery's peacemaking committee to see if such sentiment was widespread. Yes, it was! Only their crusade spouted anti-Semitism toward Israel. No rationale, just hatred toward the Jews. It seems there are like-minded overtures before the 218th General Assembly. Jack Vanderbleek Col. U.S. Army (Retired) Elder, Northeast Presbyterian Church St. Petersburg, Fla. Baby boomers have made a conscious choice to live for self May 27, 2008 Resisting Militarism has been alive and well in the Presbyterian Church (USA) for over a generation. Accurately, it should be titled "resisting the military." Sadly, it is only part and parcel to the baby boomers being the first generation in American history not to emulate the values of their ancestors. Instead of living for God or country, they have made a conscious choice to live for self. Such a lifestyle has shown itself in the promotion of materialism, consumerism and hedonism. Even more sadly, such a lifestyle has had the effect of a total lack of discipline in both parents and children today. Small wonder the United States is a target for terrorists. Sidney L. Leak III Chaplain (Colonel-Retired) USA The church should be slow to embrace the policies of political parties May 27, 2008 As an executive board member of the Witherspoon Society, I am offended by your characterization of the Witherspoon Society as a Democratic Party interest group. First, I am a Green Party member who finds both of our political parties' choices sorely lacking in anything approaching a future orientation. Second, I am a graduate of Grove City College and am quite familiar with the program and tactics of the neo conservatives for whom you so often speak. Since neither of the major political parties espouses the ethics and social responsibility taught by the Gospels I agree that we in the church should be slow to embrace the policies of those political parties wholesale. Having said that, I look forward to you explaining your embrace of the Southern strategy Republican agenda. Rev. Dr. Darcy E. Hawk Ufford-Chase's audacity to criticize those who died for his freeedom May 27, 2008 Who possibly could be surprised by the audacity of Ufford-Chase's blatant disregard for those who gave their lives so he could have the freedom to disrespect them? He is simply reflecting the attitude of the Presbyterian "elite" who demand rights and privileges but have no ability or capacity to understand the cost of such freedoms. I salute those who have served this nation with such honor. They provide the opportunity for people such as Ufford-Chase to continue to pursue their causes. I believe freedom is only true if it allows such dissent. While I find him and his actions despicable, thank God and the American soldiers of all generations he can be what he is. If, as he says, this is coincidental and he had not realized its impact then maybe he is not the person for the job, but that is another argument entirely. David W. Turner Are there any realists in Louisville? May 27, 2008 If PCUSA considers programs such as "Resisting Militarism" to be purposeful, Church missional-related and worthy of support, I am on my way out. Our nation and society have serious problems to face. It seems we, the PCUSA, choose to ignore them while we take up inane causes like this or paying the Burger King tomato pickers more money. Are there any realists in Louisville? Fred Nielsen Wallingford Presbyterian Church Wallingford, Pa. Can anyone clarify the definition and tasks of exegesis and hermeneutics? May 27, 2008 As a layman with limited formal training in Biblical interpretation (all my formal training is in electrical engineering and computer science), I am requesting that either the editors or perhaps a knowledgeable reader help me with understanding the definition and tasks of exegesis and hermeneutics. I have taught an adult Sunday school class for many years, and my understanding of the meaning of these words are largely informed by that found in How to Read the Bible for All It Is Worth by Fee and Stone. In this text, the authors explain that exegesis is the task of determining what the Scripture passage meant to the original recipients of the text, i.e. what it meant in its original context. Hermeneutics is then the task of determining what the passage means in a modern context, i.e. to us today. These authors also emphasize that exegesis must precede and inform hermeneutics to avoid completely disconnecting the modern understanding of the passage from its original meaning. This explanation seems logical to my engineer's mind. I was confused by a passage in the recent review in The Layman by David Guretski of a book on Karl Barth by Richard Burnett. The paragraph that I found confusing reads: "Biblical hermeneutics, it will be recalled, is commonly understood as reflection upon the nature and procedures of Biblical interpretation. As such, hermeneutics is often understood to be something that is logically prior to exegesis, the task of interpreting Biblical texts. In fact, this would have been more or less accepted as axiomatic among Biblical scholars and theologians of Barth's day (and to a certain extent, even today)." This seems to turn around the order of exegesis and hermeneutics. I am sure that the confusion is simply a result of my limited understanding, but would really appreciate any clarification of these definitions that you or your readers could provide. Mike Madden Talking Rock, Ga. Nazified Christianity was a natural outgrowth of theological liberalism May 27, 2008 With all due respect to my brother Larry Brown, [letter to the editor, posted May 23, 2008] he is not correct in asserting that "When the Nazis took over in Germany it was the liberals who put up what little resistance there was. Conservatives slipped on their swastika armbands and heiled Hitler along with everybody else." In actual fact, Protestant liberals overwhelmingly supported the Nazis and the so-called "German Christian" Movement, which attempted to Nazify Christianity. The reason that this happened was because liberal Protestantism based its theology on an epistemology very much akin to that of the Nazis. Liberal Protestants (much as they do today) made the same appeal to "Blood and Soil" and human experience as a source of revelation, as did the Nazis. Those who made the most significant protest against this movement within the German Protestant Church were not theological liberals. Karl Barth, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Paul Schneider and the other brave figures of the Confessing Church were not liberals or friends of theological liberalism. In fact, they argued that the emergence of a Nazified Christianity was a natural outgrowth of theological liberalism. Within our own Book of Confessions is the Theological Declaration of Barmen, the confessional declaration made by the Confessing Church. It is hardly a liberal document. Its presence in our Book of Confessions, in light of all the "blood and soil" experience-based theology in our denomination (liberation theology, feminist theology, gay theology, etc.), is an ironic sign that God has not left Himself without witness in the PCUSA today. Rev. Walter L. Taylor Oak Island Presbyterian Church Oak Island, N.C. PCUSA has gone further away from Christian values than the ACLU May 27, 2008 I guess I am one of the uninformed Presbyterians, for I did not know that we had a branch of the ACLU as a part of PCUSA. Certainly when we have groups trying to discourage young people from considering military service – while we have troops giving their lives to assure our freedoms – we seem to have gone even further away from Christian values than even the ACLU. If anyone wonders why so many congregations are seeking to leave the PCUSA, and why many Presbyterian churches are declining in membership, the leadership which allows or in some cases even fosters such lunacy as this "Peace Fellowship" is not only dishonoring our servicemen and women, but do a disservice to Presbyterians everywhere. Jay Dull Boca Raton, Fla. Misunderstanding of the history of theology in Nazi Germany and before May 27, 2008 Larry Brown [letter to the editor, posted May 23, 2008] is a good Christian but misunderstands the history of theology in Nazi Germany and before. He writes, "Liberal Protestantism actually has a proud history of community service. When the Nazis took over in Germany, it was the liberals who put up what little resistance there was. Conservatives slipped on their swastika armbands and heiled Hitler along with everybody else." Rather, it was the liberal theologians who were also nationalist who backed Hitler. Because many of them denied the deity of Jesus and believed that revelation could be found in nature or history, etc. they were ripe for accepting any revelation that became predominate in their country. Nationalism, blood and soil and Hitler as the hope for their troubles became revelation for them. On the other hand Barth, Bonhoeffer and many others understood that Jesus Christ as He is revealed in the Holy Scriptures was God's final revelation. There could be no new revelation. Jesus Christ was Lord. Today we have some of the same problems, only this time it is nature, sexuality and culture which are the new revelations. Any theologian who goes beyond Jesus Christ seeking for new revelation is opening themselves up to accept those who may and probably will usher into society various kinds of evil. A quote about the German Christians who backed Hitler: "The 'German Christians' regarded from the standpoint of Christian faith, were a liberal, nationalistic sect which, at the initiative of the National Socialist Party, formed a union of various schools and groups. These schools and groups, in spite of all differences, were united in their nationalistic tendencies and liberal Christianity." from The Church's Confession Under Hitler by Arthur C. Cochrane (page 74). When writing of the German Christians in his little book, Theological Existence Today, written in 1933 in the midst of the Confessing Church's battle with the German Christians and others, Barth stated "To be sure, their growth and increase [the German Christians] is a reason for anxiety. Still, I would not have 'taken to the floor' as if a heresy, that had never raised its head before with them, had popped up. Oh dear, no! The veriest tyro in theology knows that with their thinking we are dealing with a small collection of odds and ends from the great theological dust bins (this happy phrase is not mine; I've borrowed it) of the despised 18th and 19th centuries." Here Barth is writing of the fathers of liberal theology. So we also have a few odds and ends hanging around from the theological dust bins of the past including process theology which hangs on Schelling and Hegel. But I am starting down a different path, but not really. Viola Larson Sacramento, Calif. Resist leftist moderators May 27, 2008 I think we need a program for resisting half-baked leftist moderators of deservedly dying denominations. Toxey Hall Aren't Christians in the business of 'recruiting for Jesus?' May 27, 2008 Presbyterian Peace Fellowship's program "Resisting Militarism" is aimed at countering military recruiting. Aren't Christians in the business of "recruiting for Jesus?" Since this no longer seems to be a priority for Ufford-Chase and others of his "progressive" persuasion, perhaps Presbyterian Peace Fellowship could also schedule protests on other long weekends such as Christmas (happy holiday season) and Easter (spring break). Art Montgomery Member, PCUSA for the time being Santa Barbara, Calif. Twenty-five years of decline May 23, 2008 A month from now, the PCUSA will be holding its General Assembly in San Jose, California. No doubt, they will mark the twenty-fifth anniversary of the merger of the PCUS and UPCUSA with speech after speech all about the tremendous progress and spectacular achievements that have been made. There will be a 'gentleman's agreement' not to mention the fact that membership is down by about one-third from 1983. What will be the theme? I have some suggestions: Celebrating twenty-five years of shrinkage! Twenty-five years of purifying the membership! Plummeting but progressive! Who said bigger is better anyway? Liberal Protestantism actually has a proud history of community service. When the Nazis took over in Germany, it was the liberals who put up what little resistance there was. Conservatives slipped on their swastika armbands and heiled Hitler along with everybody else. I remember the civil rights movement; liberals marched with Martin Luther King while conservatives expressed racist ideas. But when liberal Protestantism says things like "What's the big deal about Jesus?" and worship pagan fertility goddesses, it's gone too far. Lately I've come to realize that they're using the same arguments to justify gay ordination that they used earlier to justify ordination of women: The letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. We are compelled by Christ's law of love. We need their gifts. Rather than make me more sympathetic towards gay ordination, it has caused me to backtrack a little regarding women's ordination. Larry Brown African Bible College Lilongwe, Malawi Excommunicated? May 20, 2008 Can presbyteries be excommunicated for violating Scripture? Those that submitted the overture wanting to change the definition of marriage from a man and a woman to two people should be ousted. So should those presbyteries wanting to delete the 'fidelity/chastity" ordination requirement. So should those wanting to adopt the FOG Report. The PUP (Peace, Unity and Purity) report caused many churches and thousands of members to say farewell to the PCUSA. If the above overtures are approved the mass exodus from the PCUSA will continue. The 344 staffers (super delegates) from Louisville should be enough to insure passage. Jack Vanderbleek, Elder Northeast Presbyterian Church St.Petersburg, Florida Something old, something new May 20, 2008 I find it very curious that the PCUSA talks about the property trust provision (around since the early 1980s) as if it were an ancient, hallowed tradition, but feels an urgent need to subject the Book of Order (around in some form since the 1500s) to "modern revision." Joe Rumble Wenatchee First Presbyterian Wenatchee, Washington Season of discontent May 20, 2008 I am writing this in response to Eric Wells letter posted May 16th. Some years ago, I was on my way to one of the many meetings that the Coalition has held over the years, leaving from Houston during the middle of a vacation. Sitting across from me at the airport was Winfield, "Casey" Jones. My flight was cancelled, and I ended up sharing a day with Casey Jones. Since that time, Casey and I have had the opportunity to meet during General Assemblies and other renewal events. I can testify that he is a deep Christian, who seeks to glorify Christ in all that he says and does. I am not a Commissioner to this Assembly, but I can think of no better candidate for Stated Clerk than Casey Jones. He is a man of deep faith, a gentle spirit, a good mind, an understanding of our polity, and strong Biblical convictions. Casey is not lacking in faith, in doctrine or in good deeds. Just a few years ago, my wife and I were privileged to be invited to serve on a Presbyterian Cursillo team with Vicky Jones, Casey's wife, who has a long career of ministry both at First Presbyterian Church, Houston and at Memorial Drive Presbyterian Church, Houston. Before that, if my memory serves, she was an Associate Presbyter for Evangelism for the Presbytery of New Covenant. She is a faithful pastor and a wonderful and supportive wife, a hard combination to embody. The PCUSA is also lucky to have Vicky Jones among its pastors. I have personally suggested to women in ministry that they seek out Vicky as a role model and friend. In the season of discontent, it may be best if we resist the temptation to devour our own, especially those who have faithfully served us for so long. Yours in Christ, Rev. Dr. G. Christopher Scruggs Cordova, TN 38016 Winfield Casey Jones for stated clerk May 16, 2008 Here is, yet again, another churchman endeavoring to ascend the hierarchy of the Presbyterian Church who apparently never fully outgrew the blind idealism typical of early post-adolescence. "My wife … has served for the past 10 years on the pastoral staff of two different large PCUSA congregations in Houston," he said in the news release. "My own experience, enhanced by being married to her, has helped me understand and appreciate the wondrously rich and diverse life of the PCUSA at the congregational level." Now, it's quite refreshing to see a PCUSA figure in the spotlight placing such a high premium on a mate of the opposite gender! Yet his phraseology suggests he has precious little to offer in terms of, in a comprehensive or wholesale sense, insights and solutions to the problem of mass departure. Instead of regarding both marriage and ministry as foreordained commissions, or at the very least, indemnifications of the Father's wholly unmerited grace, he regards the fruition of the latter to be largely predicated upon the former. With all of his impressive accreditations, has he not ever heard of Soli Deo Gloria? It is the Father's discernment alone, through Christ, which enables the elect to see what we needs to be seen. It is the intercessory power of the Holy Spirit which alone and in due time empowers and emboldens the elect to behave accordingly! As laudable as his intentions are to "re-educate" the laity in catechetical gravities, his own lack of doctrine is disturbing and all too terribly typical for the "potential leadership" of the PCUSA. In addition, an "ancient-modern" motif threatens to beg only more derision and cognitive dissonance in theory and application. Of these maladies, have we not yet had our fill? Eric Wells Boardman, Ohio No place for hatred May 16, 2008 As one who recently left the PCUSA after 36 years of membership and service, I found the laissez-faire attitude of the PCUSA leadership toward Rev. Wright and the Black Presbyterian Caucus, which supports him, in keeping with their attitude to avoid controversy on all issues. Black Liberation Theology emerged in the late 1960's as a mainline Protestant phenomenon. It has been ethnocentric; focusing only on one part of the human race, and it has elevated black experience to the norm. In so doing has interpreted the biblical themes of salvation and judgment in socio-political themes in service of freedom for blacks. That it has served a purpose in raising the sense of dignity among blacks is without question. But Black Theology is a system to initiate social change and not a theological system of dogmas about the nature of God and man. Black Theology has God always taking sides with the poor and the oppressed and being actively against the oppressors. Its theology is primarily focused about life in this world, emphasizing God as immanent "in the world" while virtually ignoring His transcendence "over the world." The God of Black Theology is changeable and is not the God of Scripture who "changes not." Jesus is a messiah only of political involvement who is always on the side of the oppressed and against the oppressor. Jesus is not the Savior Who satisfies or propitiates God's wrath but is viewed as a moral influence for social change through political action. The role of the Holy Spirit is virtually absent and the Bible only provides some specific, but often unreliable, accounts of human history. The church is a means to change society by emphasizing ethics that achieve the ends of the movement. The problem with all Liberation theologies is that they tend to overrate the power of man and underrate the power of God. Thus, what is inherently wrong with Black Liberation theology is that it is bad social science (bordering on Marxism) and bad theology (selectively using the Bible as a means to an end). James Cone, perhaps the most articulate spokesman of black theology, wrote, "Black theology refuses to accept a God who is not identified totally with the goals of the black community. If God is not for us, if God is not against white racists, then he is a murderer, and we had better kill him. The task of black theology is to kill gods that do not belong to the black community." (A Black Theology of Liberation, p. 27) "The black theologian must reject any conception of God which stifles black self-determination by picturing God as a God of all peoples." (p. 63) The most often repeated assertion of Black Liberation Theology is that God is on the side of the oppressed AND is the enemy of the oppressors. Therefore, Christians are required to take sides by loving the former and hating the latter. But is this what we find in Scripture? True, Jesus is the friend of publicans and sinners, eating with them and calling them to be His disciples. He showed boundless love and compassion for those who were looked upon with abysmal contempt by the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the Romans, and the Greeks. But this does not mean that Jesus hated those who were not among the wretched of the earth. He was after all a friend of Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea who belonged to the "establishment." He brought Jairus' daughter back to life and Jairus was a ruler of a synagogue. He healed a centurion's servant and praised him for his faith and a centurion was a representative of Roman authority. He saved Zacchaeus who was a rich extortioner. He accepted a dinner invitation from Simon the Pharisee and He transformed Saul of Tarsus, a highly educated and wealthy man. There is NO place in Christianity for class or race hatred in any form. The Black Liberationists are wrong when they assert that Christians must love the oppressed and hate the oppressor. Liberationists who advocate revolution find Romans 13:1-8 especially to be a thorn in their side. Therefore many Liberationists re-interpret this passage in order to hold to their theology. While this passage does emphasize peace, goodwill, overcoming evil with good, nowhere does it give the slightest support to revolutionaries. One does not have to become a Black or other Liberationist to sympathize with the wretched of the earth and to come to their assistance. Paul A. Tambrino, Ed.D., Ph.D. Assistant Pastor of Theological Education Willow Creek Church (PCA) Winter Springs, Fla. Sabotage in college theology May 16, 2008 Thank you for your excellent commentary on this very prevalent emergence of the sabotage of the American theological mindset. Given the nature of the demise of the power of the Gospel as delineated in the only guide fit for use, we can come to some very troubling conclusions regarding this series of events and strategies promoted by the enemy of our souls. However, where one may see a warning, others may see a promise being fulfilled. This fact is also true in reverse, that where one finds a promise in the Word, one can also find a warning. Fulfill the tenets of the promise, and hope thrives; ignore it, and pay the consequences. As it pertains to this particular case, it stands to reason, but not to reason alone, that what we are seeing is a fulfillment that there would be those scratching itchy ears filling pulpits, and this is nothing new. When conflict arose in the Corinthian fellowship, Paul stated that there had to be divisions among them, because in having division, some were proved to be right, and others proved to be heretical. I would strongly advise that the students who practice the truth of the Word in all of its essence be allowed to subjugate themselves to this man's teaching, but not for the purpose of establishing it as the pretext of what to preach, but to learn his perspective, to pray, and to expose the falsehoods for what they are. In other words, we can learn how the enemy is attacking, and to bring the salt and light to the body of Christ, and to enable some within the laity to be able to thwart this hypocrisy. For the students' sake, discipleship is the key, coupled with an increasingly intimate bond with those who know Christ, and this must exceed that impact of classroom conjecture. In every other Davidson classroom, there must be an overwhelming message that mirrors that of Jesus which is to beware the yeast promoted by this type of teacher. Perhaps he can be swayed by someone who truly knows the Word, that is, Christ, rather than the Word, that is, the book. We are indeed facing an enemy who shapes his weapons to fit the perverse idiosyncrasies of each age, and perhaps this will add some fuel to the fire. I refer to adding fuel to the fire that fights the fire of heresy. R. Wayne Howe Toccoa, Ga. Jane Spahr ruling May 15, 2008 Proverbs 24:23-25 says, "To show partiality in judging is not good: Whoever says to the guilty 'You are innocent' – peoples will curse him and nations denounce him. But it will go well with those who convict the guilty, and rich blessing will come upon them." This ruling is just further evidence that the people in Louisville are not guided by the Holy Scriptures, and we who desire to lead lives of obedience to God should not take direction from them! Fred Hoaglin Hilton Head Island, S.C. Good news from Aurora May 15, 2008 Thank you for including the article from the Beacon News about Aurora First Church. Having been part of that great family of faith for 10 years, I can say that this is a ministry that is solid in their reaching out to a world that needs to hear of the love of Christ. It has stayed in the center of the community when most moved to suburbs, and through it all the name of Christ has been uplifted. Woody Johnson Scottsdale, Ariz. The PCUSA and Rev. Wright May 14, 2008 I find it interesting that the PCUSA would stand idly by as the Black Presbyterian Caucus supports Rev. Wrong (sorry – I meant Wright). Perhaps it is time for the PCUSA to drop USA from its title, for they certainly do nothing to represent the values of the founders of our nation. With the laissez-faire attitude of the PCUSA leadership, they could easily adopt a new name – The Presbyterian Church of the What's Happening Now. They tend to check wind gage by placing a finger in the air to see which way the wind is blowing and then go whatever direction will cause absolutely no controversy. True leadership, n'est-ce pas? Jay Dull Boca Raton, Fla. Truth and love May 14, 2008 I support the Presbyterian Lay Committee 100 percent, but I wish there was a way to present the Biblical truth to the Covenant Network types of people in a kinder, gentler and more loving way than in militant terms of battles, warfare, etc. Maybe that isn't possible, but I pray that the PLC can always be a witness to and for the love of Jesus Christ. Incidentally, are you aware that the Covenant Network has mailed to each General Assembly commissioner a copy of Jack Rogers book Jesus, the Bible, and Homosexuality? Carol McClellen Abillene, Texas Editor's Note: The Layman review of Jesus, the Bible and Homosexuality is posted here. Calling progressive screeds 'prophetic' shows abysmal judgment May 12, 2008 "Progressive theology" typically justifies what otherwise would constitute hatred, racism, classism, sexism and general entitlement of celebrity victims as "being prophetic." I notice that these self-proclaimed "prophets" maintain a progressive lifestyle: not a hair-shirt among them and most look like they've been eating more than a diet of locusts and wild honey. Both Mr. Wright and those who defend him defame the prophetic tradition as well as preachers throughout the ages who lifestyle of suffering and dedicated service wasn't backed up by ostentation and self-righteousness. Calling these screeds and rants "prophetic" shows abysmal judgment. Donald D. Denton Richmond, Va. GA must recognize PCUSA's loss of members May 12, 2008 Being in Africa, I've just received the special two-volume edition of The Layman, which features the Katrina relief effort. Inside, it repeats the doleful statistics of how the PCUSA, with its predecessor denominations PCUS and UPCUSA, has lost half its membership since the mid-1960s. The number of missionaries has dropped from 1,900 in 1959 to less than 200 today, although support to the militantly leftist World Council of Churches is maintained. It seems clear to me that the leadership of the PCUSA have over the years been in denial. When I say denial, I'm not talking about a river in Egypt. If the PCUSA were listed on the New York Stock Exchange, what would its stock be worth today? Although I'm in the EPC, I honestly would hate to see the PCUSA go down the tubes; it means so much to so many godly people. And I've learned that denominational labels don't really mean diddly-squat anyway. There are sub-groups in every denomination, and that sub-group in that denomination over here, and that sub-group in that one over there, can more easily communicate with one another than either can communicate with the mainstream of their respective denominations. There are PCUSA churches in which I would still feel comfortable. In about six weeks the PCUSA will have its General Assembly. I hope that as it observes 25 years of being a reunited denomination, there will a frank recognition that it has lost almost a third of its people since 1983. I hope that someone gets up there and has a real epiphany: "Hey! We're dying!" That would be the very first step in revitalizing a once-great denomination. Larry Brown African Bible College Lilongwe, Malawi Information on female deacons May 12, 2008 The Presbyterian Church of America will be dealing with the question of setting up a study committee for possible changes to its Book of Church Order with regard to female deacons. Here is a Web site compiling all the information. We are always looking for more links, if anyone has any to suggest. Marshall St. John Jr. 'It rather appears the Reformation is gathering a second wind!' May 12, 2008 Within the preponderance of measures implemented in Louisville and the various synods in the PCUSA to prevent churches from leaving, one may easily determine why so many are thus inclined. These strong arm methods are symptomatic of the reliance on man-made protocol and conveniently manufactured precedent in lieu of explicit Scriptural justification. This is the very penchant, one clearly rooted in the culture of rancid cliquishness, secularism and power-mongering, that led a certain German monk to post a document on a church door in Wittenberg, Germany. It rather appears the Reformation is gathering a second wind! If given unflinching consideration, this tendency of our so-called leadership is at the very heart of all that ails us as a denomination. We know not what the future holds, yet we certainly should draw a little perspective from the past. Pearl S. Buck, daughter of a Southern Presbyterian missionary, once wrote that "knowledge of history as detailed as possible is essential if we want to comprehend the past and be prepared for the future." The tradition rich Reformed diaspora, with all concomitant scholasticism inherent, offers us a wealth of insights to this end. Centuries ago, issues of this sort and their consequences were addressed by Calvin, himself: Since men have turned aside from pure and holy obedience to God, they have discovered that good intention was sufficient to approve everything. This was to open a door to all superstitions. It has been the origin of the worship of images, the purchase of masses, the filling of churches with pomp and parade, the running about on pilgrimages, the making of vows by each at his own hand. But the abyss here is so profound that it is good enough for us to have touched some examples. So far is it from being permitted to honour God by human inventions, that there would be no firmness nor certainty, neither bottom nor shore in religion: every thing would go to wreck, and Christianity differ in nothing from the idolatries of the heathen. (Cited from Calvin's Tracts and Treatises, vol. 2.) I've long determined those currently at the bureaucratic helm of the PCUSA are but expendable agents who are selected by cabals well beyond the camera lens; intent being to debase classical apologetics to further globalistic interests. They will sooner or later be forced to recognize the link between constitutional semantic manipulation and widespread disinterest, reflected by paltry returns in the collection plate. In likely course, individual congregations, aghast by the venom and wanton disregard for Scriptural authority, will feel less bound to adhere to the precedent of requesting dismissal from the PCUSA. They'll simply leave, period! Hence, the threat of Synodical coup d'etat will be greatly diminished. Will the last person out of the PCUSA please turn out the lights? After all, we don't need an electric bill as staggering as general impiety of the upper echelon. Eric Wells Boardman, Ohio Fair and balanced May 7, 2008 Thank you Layman for printing Jerry Voight's letter (May 5). Having lived in South Carolina for five years, I didn't think there were people with Jerry's views living in that state. It is refreshing to see that The Layman continues to be fair and balanced in its reporting. It is for that very same reason that I watch Fox News exclusively. Ed McLean Maitland, Fla. Logic spiral May 7, 2008 The recent GAPJC decision on Jane Spahr's defiance of the Scriptures and the PCUSA constitution signals how thick the absurd self-deception of some in the PCUSA has grown. Such illogic does not pass the fifth grade reasoning test. The fact that the majority of the PJC can produce such a decision with a straight face is a sad and disturbing sign of the insulated world of theological/bureaucratic haziness that surrounds this denomination. They actually think this makes sense. Well, it does, but only if you have spiraled downward in a Romans 1 kind of way. Rev. D. Wayne Bogue Hudson Presbyterian Church (NWEPC) Hudson, Ohio Assumption of Justice, Pt. III May 7, 2008 Lloyd Lunceford is right in stating in his May 5th letter that there is no legal support for a denominational claim of a trust interest in local church property. He also debunks any claim of historical support for a denominational trust. My letter of May 2nd clearly shows that there is no Scriptural support for a denominational trust. Why, then, is there a trust claim in the Book of Order? Why does the Book of Order make this questionable claim when by its own admission, it is "purely moral or spiritual in its object, and not attended with any civil effects"? G-1.0308 Mr. Lunceford wonders what the denomination's in house lawyers were thinking when they give advice contrary to the clear reading of the cases and the law. I would suggest the Louisville Papers give clear evidence of what they were thinking. The denominational lawyers are attempting to use un-Godly and un-Biblical methods to confiscate local property that the denomination did not buy or pay for. The denominational lowerarchy has never repudiated the Louisville Papers or their secretive practices. Local ownership of church property by particular churches is one of the principles that the founders of Presbyterianism, Calvin and Knox, instituted as a means of protecting doctrinal purity. The accumulation of property, money, and power in a hierarchical regime resulted in an apostasy from Biblical beliefs and practices. This apostasy led to the Reformation. Limiting the hierarchy limits the idolatry of property, money and power which leads the visible church astray. The denominational trust claims, lacking any legitimate basis, have led only to strife and controversy. Where, I ask, is the PCUSA going? Donald G. Nichol Walden, N.Y. See you in heaven May 7, 2008 (Re the homegoing of Dr. R. Laird Harris) He was my Hebrew and ancient Acadian and Old Testament Biblical studies Professor at Covenant Seminary in the early 60's. Because of him, I still prepare Old Testament sermons from the Hebrew text and enjoy word studies. A gentle soul but a bear of a scholar. He was a quiet giant of the faith and I love him even after 40 years. See you in heaven, Dr. H. Rev. Bill Solomon Montreat, N.C. Wright was wrong response May 7, 2008 (re: The Rev. Wright Was Wrong) Amen, and two wrongs won't make it right! Fred Hoaglin, elder Providence Presbyterian Church Hilton Head Island, S.C. Presbyterian or Episcopal? May 7, 2008 So once again the PCUSA is looking less and less Presbyterian in government and more and more Episcopal. The PCUSA – with its top down power plays – gives a lot of lip service to this "connectional" form of government but in reality they are not. While I agree with the top down model, I am just glad I made it into a communion that is validly Episcopal rather than just acting that way. Dennis Russell Kalamazoo, Mich. Unhappy reader May 5, 2008 I cannot believe the ignorance, bigotry, self-serving prophetizing (sic) and hate-filled divisive talk that is certainly not journalism or truth. This "paper" is an insult to the Presbyterian church with its backward thinking and low intellect (sic) tone of your pursuit of self-elevating power. It must be about the money. I wish you would claim your faith and just leave – go join the EPC if your faith is so sure! You are starting to act like the radical Islamic terrorists with your "talk." But like them, it too is about the power of oil and money. Jerry Voight Hilton Head Island, S.C. Amendment: Assumption of Jurisdiction May 5, 2008 Don Nichol, an astute attorney and faithful elder, makes some very good points in his May 2nd letter, but I humbly offer a postscript. His letter concludes by admonishing the PCUSA for basing its Book of Order claim of an enforceable property trust on a U.S. Supreme Court decision rather than basing its claim on Scripture. The PCUSA's position is actually even less defensible than my colleague Mr. Nichol suggests. The PCUSA's claim finds no support in the U.S. Supreme Court either. The case often relied on by PCUSA officials, Jones v. Wolf, 443 U.S.595 (1979), actually made clear that any trust claims in denominational constitutions must be the product of mutual consent. The Supreme Court in Jones said,"[T]he parties can ensure, if they so desire, that the faction loyal to the hierarchical church will retain the church property. They can modify the deeds or the corporate charter to include a right of reversion or trust in favor of the general church. Alternatively, the constitution of the general church can be made to recite a trust in favor of the denominational church…[C]ivil courts will be bound to give effect to the result indicated by the parties, provided it is embodied in some legally cognizable form." Id. at 606 (emphasis added). The need for clear consent by the local property owner of record – the other party – is unavoidable. Jones did not allow national denominations to expropriate locally owned property by unilateral fiat. Jones merely recommended mutual, pre-dispute agreements in some form ordinarily recognized by the civil law as enforceable. That usually requires clear and express consent in writing by the local property owner, among other requirements. But congregational votes were not part of the amendment process when the trust clauses were added to the Book of Order. Moreover, in many ( probably most) cases, the actual property owner of record – the other party – is the local church corporation, whose members and board of directors were not consulted and had no official say in the amendment process. And subsequent, long association with the denomination did not convert a property right previously vested in the local corporation into a non-vested right up for grabs by the denomination. In response, PCUSA officials have argued that the local church corporations are subject to the PCUSA's Book of Order – as the Book of Order not surprisingly claims for itself. However, under the law of every state in the Union, a local religious corporation, formed by the state, is a separate legal entity than its corresponding local congregation. The local corporation has separate functions and powers, like holding title to local church property. Accordingly, courts that follow neutral principles of law have typically rejected attempts by national denominations to use self-dealing ecclesiastical edicts to subordinate and control civil corporations. Jones held that applying to religious institutions the same property law everyone else had to obey ("neutral principles of law") did not violate the federal constitution's religion clauses. Another, older, U.S. Supreme Court decision is also worth noting on this topic of a claimed enforceable trust in favor of the national denomination. Watson v. Jones, 80 U.S.679 (1871) had previously given states the option of deferring to ecclesiastical authorities (in hierarchical denominations), as a method to resolve local church property disputes. In a much publicized column appearing a year or so ago in The Presbyterian Outlook, PCUSA lawyer Mark Tammen and former PCUSA lawyer Eric Graninger curiously cited Watson in support of their controversial assertion that a property trust over local church property had been a feature of Presbyterianism since its 16th Century inception, and was "essential" to Presbyterian connectionalism. Left unmentioned in their article, though, was Watson's specific explanation of the real party in whose favor this ancient trust was to benefit. By this omission readers were left to conclude that this ancient trust concept was for the benefit of the national denomination, i.e., the same beneficiary now mentioned in the Book of Order. Nothing could be further from the truth. Tammen and Graninger left readers to incorrectly mix apples and oranges. The Book of Order asserts an alleged trust for the use and benefit of the PCUSA, the national denomination. In stark contrast to this, the U.S. Supreme Court in Watson instead expressly rejected the proposition that a trust always existed in Presbyterianism in favor of the national denomination. Citing Watson for this proposition stands Watson on its head. One doesn't need a law degree to see this, only an ability to read English.One can only wonder what Tammen and Graninger were thinking. In Watson the court was confronted with two competing trust assertions. One party contended that in Presbyterianism a trust always existed favor of the majority in a local congregation. The other party contended that in Presbyterianism a trust always existed in favor of the national denomination (called "the general body" in Watson). The U.S. Supreme Court rejected both contentions. In doing so, it said that prior to 1813 the courts had not settled on any definite rule. In 1813, though, the House of Lords ruled in a case arising in Scotland (which Watson characterized as the "native home of Presbyterian faith and form of government") and rejected both contentions, in the case of Craigdallie.v.Aikman, 2 Bligh, 529 ;1Dow. Since that time, the U.S. Supreme Court went on to say, Craigdallie's ruling "has been accepted in all cases of this nature in England, Scotland and America." Watson at 705. Instead of a trust existing always in favor of either the majority of the local congregation or in favor of the national denomination, Watson said that any potential trust existed only in favor of that part of the society (whether local or national) …" adhering to and maintaining the original principles upon which it was founded." Id. Because the civil courts of the state should not be making such intrinsically religious decisions about doctrinal fidelity, Watson authorized state courts to defer to ecclesiastical bodies ( in hierarchical denominations) to make this determination.This approach is called the hierarchical deference rule. While still constitutionally permissible, most states have since opted for the more favored neutral principles of law approach. But by whatever method is followed to resolve local church property disputes, whether hierarchical deference or neutral principles, the U.S. Supreme Court long ago rejected the notion that an enforceable property trust, always for the benefit of the national denomination, is inherent in what it means to be Presbyterian or somehow essential to Presbyterian connectionalism. Any contention to the contrary is a modern myth, asserted unknowingly or for momentary convenience by those who would try to convince others that confiscating property that has been bought and paid for by others and titled in another's name is somehow godly or biblical. Lloyd J. Lunceford, Esq. Baton Rouge, Louisiana (Ed. Note – the author is the general editor to A Guide to Church Property Law (Reformation Press) and an attorney with Taylor, Porter, Brooks & Phillips, LLP, Baton Rouge, Louisiana) Defining marriage May 5, 2008 It is easy to think of a variety of alternate arrangements to marriage between a man and woman. Suppose a Presbyterian minister conducted a ceremony between a man and a child. Is this still a marriage? Any if not – can anyone be sanctioned or disciplined? A better question is: What standards does the PCUSA still maintain or believe? The Presbyterian church is in a free fall down a slippery slope with no landing in sight. Rob Morris Princeton, New Jersey If my people May 5, 2008 The recent issue (Spring 2008) of The Layman revealed a fact that should be dealt with by the PCUSA (not just "addressed"): The Lord cannot bless the PCUSA for allowing "sin in the camp" – specifically homosexual behaviors, marrying of gays and lesbians, and other blatant allowances. Certainly, sinners saved by grace should reflect the change that has taken place, as stated in our Bibles. When Presbyterian churches wish to withdraw from the PCUSA, their church buildings and property are absconded which have been built and supported over the years to meet the spiritual and communal needs of that congregation, for God's glory – when church property is taken, how do you think that a sale (if possible) will be a blessing to those in that community where it has been a "lighthouse" for many years and used to reach the lost and nurture Christians in their faith? 2 Chronicles 7:14 is still applicable today: "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sins, and will heal their land..." D.B. Johnson Mora, Minn. What happened? May 5, 2008 What has happened to the church I grew up in? This is the church I learned all of these things in – chastity, charity, honesty, and that the Word is a precious compass for our lives. Growing up, I was proud to let people know: "I am Presbyterian." I equated even the word presbyterian with "unwavering" in my mind. Upon visiting the GA as a teenager, I felt unworthy to even step on to the carpet in the room. I have watched the church of my youth dissolving before my eyes; a church that has now become so steeped in "Christian activities," but hisses like an angry cat if someone dares to quote a Scripture verse, or invites an impoverished passerby in to the Sunday service. The thought of leaving the church where my family has been for over 50 years, where I was married, and where my 3 boys have been baptized (by ministers who were like family to us) has left me saddened beyond words. May Almighty God bless your efforts and multiply them and I pray you will not become discouraged. Karen Brock Joplin, Mo. Swimming against scholarship May 5, 2008 Regarding Professor who shuns Reformed theology hired to teach it at Davidson College: I'm reading Timothy Keller's The Reason for God. This, along with N. T. Wright's The Resurrection of the Son of God, and other studies causes me to think the 'progressives' are swimming against the tide of recent scholarship. William G. Billings Bartlesville, Okla Assumption of Jurisdiction – Synod of the Sun May 2, 2008 The Synod of the Sun has purported to appoint an administrative commission ("AC") to have final approval of property decisions in the Presbytery of South Louisiana (see The Empire Strikes Back). This action clearly signals that the Presbyterian Church (USA) is attempting to become what it has instructed its lawyers to represent that it is – a hierarchical (not Presbyterian) church. I fail to find any support in the PCUSA constitution for what the synod has purported to do in claiming original jurisdiction for its AC in property decisions. The property decisions are clearly within the realm of the lower judicatories. The claim that "All pending and future decisions regarding property in the Presbytery of South Louisiana shall require the approval of the commission" is clearly seeking to usurp authority which does not belong to the synod. The letter to synod, from the few kvetching about the presbytery's actions recognizing local church ownership, clearly requests the formation of an AC to take "original jurisdiction." Search the Book of Order to find any authority for synod appointing an AC to take "original jurisdiction" over any presbytery (or particular church) function. I find none. "Original jurisdiction" is a term of art used for the court which has the authority to initially decide a "case." The Rules of Discipline define what a "case" is. As I wrote in a previously published article in The Layman, the use of the G11.0103(s) authority to takeover the offices of elders on session under the guise of assuming original jurisdiction is a misuse of such authority. Original jurisdiction is limited to a particular "case." It is not a right to occupy the offices of elders on the session, whose election to those offices is an inalienable right of the congregation. G-6.0107 Such a usurpation is hierarchical in nature and not Presbyterian. Here, the synod's action does not have even the pretense of authority claimed for a presbytery AC by virtue of G11.0103(s). It is totally contrary to the Presbyterian system. Look at the basis for the establishment of Presbyterian governance. It is stated in the Westminster Confession, Book of Confessions, 6.173: "For the better government and further edification of the Church, there ought to be such assemblies as are commonly called synods or councils [all higher judicatories]: and it belongeth to the overseers and other rulers of the particular churches, by virtue of their office, and the power which Christ hath given them for edification, and not for destruction, to appoint such assemblies; and to convene together in them, as often as they shall judge it expedient for the good of the Church." The power and authority in Presbyterian governance is given by Christ, found in particular churches, and delegated "upward" to higher councils convened by the local elders as deemed expedient. The authority does not come down from any self proclaimed hierarchy. Indeed, we are warned of the "greater danger from the usurped claim of making laws." Historically, Presbyterianism was held together by shared belief in the sovereign LORD and the rule of His revealed Word. Now, when He and His Word are no longer highly regarded, but twisted into shadowy likenesses of what suits the whims of those who preach another gospel – which is no gospel – then, the powers that be must invoke obedience to hierarchy, rather than obedience to His Word, in an attempt to hold things together. These usurpations and misuses of authority must be denied, and shown for what they are (Book of Confessions, 3.20) or we shall have what they desire – a new monstrosity which ought properly be called the Hierarchical Church (USA). What I find most disturbing regarding the ongoing property squabble is the lack Biblical, theological support for the positions of the parties. I was taught that the one question a Presbyterian asks when presented with any issue is "What does the Bible say?" Can the PCUSA adopt any position which is not simply declarative of the revealed Word? I find plenty of Biblical support for local ownership of particular churches (Rom 16:5, 1Cor 16:9, Phil 4:15, Phm 1:2, & 2John 10). I find no Biblical or Confessional support for a denominational trust. The Westminster Confession, Book of Confessions, 6.148, tells us that property rights are not affected by church relation. The Confession cites Acts 5:4 as its authority. The founders of Presbyterianism, Knox and Melville, in the Books of Discipline of 1560 and 1578 placed church property in the control of deacons, a local church office. Why then does anyone think that the fact that virtually every lot, plot, and parcel of real property, and the improvements thereon, is titled in the name of the local church is not a reflection of the intent of the parties concerning ownership of that property? Was there no one who could draft a trust clause for the deed if that were the intent? Nonsense! The trust claims lately tacked onto the Book of Order were based on a mistaken belief that the US Supreme Court in 1979 invited denominations to make a unilateral declaration of a trust interest in local church property. However, effective trusts may be declared only by the existing title owners, not the beneficiaries. The trust claims represent a violation of the 10th commandment in their claiming of property which does not – and never did – belong to the denomination. Those that contend for a denominational trust should be ashamed that the source of their belief comes from a Supreme Court decision and not from the Word of our God. Donald G. Nichol Walden, N.Y. (Ed. Note – Mr. Nichol is an attorney with Jacobwitz and Gubits, LLP, and a Presbyterian elder) Closer fellowship May 2, 2008 I just wanted you to know how very much I enjoyed the editorial by Parker Williamson and the column by Chuck Burge (Spring 2008 issue of The Layman – ed.). I am an elder at First Presbyterian in Mooresville, N.C. I just turned 80 last month. I remember very well seeing this whole business coming in the days of the PCUS. I remember vehement denials that there was any plan "a foot" to merge with PSUSA! Ha! Both of your well written columns reminded me of a quote from A. W. Tozer: "One hundred worshipers meeting together, each one looking away to Christ, are in heart nearer to each other than they could possibly be were they to become 'unity' conscious and turn their eyes away from God to strive for closer fellowship." Thanks for all you're doing. William Smith Kirk Mooresville, N.C. Spahr decision indicative May 2, 2008 So, Rev. Spahr has been exonerated of the offense she was accused of committing, because the offense she was accused of committing doesn't exist? Brilliant! Lewis Carroll should have included that one in Alice in Wonderland. I'm afraid that all this is indicative of how next month's General Assembly will go. The only thing that seems holy to the PCUSA power structure is perpetuation of the status quo. So just watch: the people elected to the offices of moderator and stated clerk will be clones of their predecessors. The left wing will almost, but not quite, succeed in getting unrestricted ordination of homosexuals passed. And so on and on it goes. Larry Brown African Bible College, Malawi Love crime? May 2, 2008 Concerning the story link: "Moorpark Presbyterian Church vandalism suspected hate crime" to the Ventura County Star: Did anyone think it was a love crime? Pete Simpson Bloomington, Minn. Clear intent May 1, 2008 I'll have to differ with Mr. Millbrook (letter to the editor, posted April 30, 2008). Jane Spahr's interpretation of 'is' was never in doubt. She was perfectly clear in stating that she was performing marriages. She was quite bold in doing so and it seems obvious to me that she wanted to be reprimanded. Her tactic was to force the issue using the church courts as a platform for her views. Whether you agree with her or not, Jane was always clear as to her reasons for doing what she was doing. It is the GAPJC that is trying to redefine terms here, not Jane Spahr. This decision will do nothing to aid those who advocate for GLBT issues in our denomination. In fact, it appears to me to be a slap in the face to all of those who have ever participated in such ceremonies. It is nothing less than denominational censorship of those who are crystal clear in their actions and beliefs. Absolutely ludicrous. Rev. Nathan Lamb Hartford, Iowa Slanting Spahr story May 1, 2008 Putting the desired slant on the news, Louisville's house organ, the PNS (Presbyterian News Service), headlined its report of the Spahr decision with the words "Spahr found innocent...." Wrong! Spahr has never denied that she did the things she was charged with. The GAPJC simply used a judicial ploy to declare that those things were a judicial impossibility and not punishable. It is one thing to say "I didn't do it. I am innocent." and quite another to say "I did it, and you can't do anything about it." Michael R. "Mac" McCarty Left behind? May 1, 2008 The Presbyterian Church (USA) gets weirder and weirder. Jane Spahr said she performed these weddings and should be reprimanded for breaking the rules of the church. This church, in my opinion, is doing more to serve Satan than Jesus. Are you trying to ruin the whole church? I attend a small church in Ardara, Pennsylvania: Redstone Presbytery. Our pastor has already taken retirement rather than try to preach under conditions that are not Scriptural. Jesus is coming soon to take His church home. I am not sure if you all won't be left behind. Lloyd Myers Trafford, Pa. Physics of Resurrection May 1, 2008 (Regarding the commentary on Douglas Ottati, theology professor for Davidson College – Ed.) The article states that Dr. Ottati doubts the bodily resurrection of Jesus because of the "physics." By this I presume he means there is no principle of physics that would permit a resurrection. He may be right – there is no such principle that we know of now. Our understanding of existence is limited to our five senses as interpreted by the gray matter in our skull. Are we to say that unless we can see, taste, hear, touch or smell it, it cannot exist? Did infrared exist 100 years ago, even though we could not see it? It is likely that there are many aspects of existence which we have as yet been unable to measure, or perhaps will never be able to grasp because of the limitations of our physical natures. This does not mean they are not real, including the resurrection of the body. To deny this possibility is unscientific. Chris Small Winston-Salem, N.C. Malawi miracle May 1, 2008 One Sunday night, about four weeks ago, I was at the home of African Bible College founder and president Jack Chinchen. We have a Sunday evening vespers service at the ABC chapel, and then the Chinchens have staff members over for waffles and pancakes. But on this particular occasion Toni Moffatt, the administrator of the Community Clinic, came bursting into the house, in a hysterical state. "I hit somebody! I hit somebody!" Just after dark, she was on the Mchinji Road on her way to our campus and was perhaps half a kilometer from our entrance when a man ran out in front of her. There was no way that she could have stopped. She pulled off on the side of the road and got out of her car and attempted to flag down passing cars. Nobody stopped, and two men on foot suddenly appeared and said, "Get out of here! Get out of here! Go! Go!" Flustered, she jumped into her car and came to us. Later it was found that her car was so badly damaged that it had to be put into the shop. Hitting a Malawian pedestrian with your car is an expatriate's worst nightmare. Last year I got stopped for doing 80 kilometers (50 mph) per hour in a 50 (30 mph) zone (open highway, no other vehicles in sight). The police took my license, threatened to impound my vehicle, and the next day I had to pay a 40,000 kwacha ($300) fine. I know another white expatriate who was given a one-year suspended jail sentence because the mandatory insurance decal on the windshield expired the day before. And people here can be oblivious; they aren't taught from childhood to look both ways before crossing the street. Once I was driving down a street and a man walked into my moving car while talking to some friends standing on the curb behind him. So anyway a bunch of men including our physician, Dr. Mark Boersma, jumped into my car and we drove to the scene of the accident. They looked at the body of the man – lying on the side of the highway – by the light of my car headlights. His shoes were on the highway. He was still breathing, but his head was split open and was bleeding profusely, and his brains had spilled out. Also, he had a broken leg. Mark said that it was impossible for him to survive the night. The police arrived on the scene. Normally, if you want a policeman, you must be able to drive to the station and pick one up; they're short on vehicles. But we called by cell phone McLeod Munthali, our radio station manager, and he went to the station and got a pair of cops and brought them out to us. At first, the cops insisted that I take the bloody body to Lilongwe Central Hospital in my car. This is a place where patients have been known to starve to death because there was no one to feed them. But then, a police truck arrived, and the cops stuffed the man's brains back into the cranium and heaved the body like a sack of potatoes into the truck and drove off. A few days later, I learned to my surprise that the victim had survived the night. A few days after that, I was further surprised to hear that he was conscious and was beginning to speak. Last night I learned that the victim has been dismissed from the hospital and is now at home. He is able to give an account of that evening. Two men (maybe the ones that told Toni to go?) were trying to steal his bicycle, and then started chasing him. In fear for his life, he ran out into the highway. He says that he thought people would stop for him. Had Toni not hit him, perhaps the robbers would have caught up with him and killed him. Up till now, I've said that miracles are like UFOs and Bigfoot; they get reported by other people, but you never see one yourself. But now I have a first-hand miracle story to tell. Larry Brown African Bible College, Malawi

Home · News · PLC Publications · The Layman Online Reviews · Archives· History of the Lay Committee · Feedback · Links